|
2010 BCS STANDINGS
(SIMULATED) – WEEK 3
Rank |
Pvs |
Team |
Rk |
Coach |
% |
Rk |
AP |
% |
Md |
CM |
JS |
KM |
PW |
RB |
Cp Avg |
BCS |
Conf |
1 |
1 |
Alabama |
1 |
1470 |
0.9966 |
1 |
1492 |
0.9947 |
25 |
22 |
22 |
20 |
0 |
25 |
0.890 |
0.9604 |
SEC |
2 |
2 |
Texas |
4 |
1251 |
0.8481 |
7 |
1164 |
0.7760 |
22 |
24 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
24 |
0.950 |
0.8580 |
B12 |
3 |
3 |
Ohio State |
2 |
1410 |
0.9559 |
2 |
1435 |
0.9567 |
20 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0.400 |
0.7709 |
BTen |
4 |
5 |
Florida |
8 |
1092 |
0.7403 |
9 |
1044 |
0.6960 |
24 |
21 |
24 |
16 |
0 |
23 |
0.840 |
0.7588 |
SEC |
5 |
4 |
Oklahoma |
9 |
1060 |
0.7186 |
8 |
1114 |
0.7427 |
19 |
25 |
21 |
24 |
0 |
17 |
0.810 |
0.7571 |
B12 |
6 |
6 |
Boise State |
3 |
1291 |
0.8753 |
3 |
1333 |
0.8887 |
23 |
0 |
23 |
4 |
0 |
22 |
0.490 |
0.7513 |
WAC |
7 |
8 |
TCU |
5 |
1188 |
0.8054 |
4 |
1280 |
0.8533 |
21 |
13 |
18 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
0.560 |
0.7396 |
MWC |
8 |
7 |
Oregon |
6 |
1181 |
0.8007 |
5 |
1238 |
0.8253 |
17 |
0 |
17 |
2 |
0 |
16 |
0.350 |
0.6587 |
P10 |
9 |
10 |
Nebraska |
7 |
1135 |
0.7695 |
6 |
1175 |
0.7833 |
18 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
0 |
11 |
0.350 |
0.6343 |
B12 |
10 |
12 |
LSU |
12 |
801 |
0.5431 |
15 |
654 |
0.4360 |
16 |
7 |
19 |
13 |
0 |
18 |
0.540 |
0.5064 |
SEC |
11 |
13 |
Wisconsin |
10 |
884 |
0.5993 |
11 |
803 |
0.5353 |
8 |
15 |
5 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
0.290 |
0.4749 |
BTen |
12 |
21 |
Arizona |
16 |
610 |
0.4136 |
14 |
663 |
0.4420 |
14 |
20 |
10 |
18 |
0 |
14 |
0.560 |
0.4719 |
P10 |
13 |
15 |
Arkansas |
11 |
846 |
0.5736 |
10 |
903 |
0.6020 |
13 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.130 |
0.4352 |
SEC |
14 |
14 |
South Carolina |
15 |
612 |
0.4149 |
12 |
739 |
0.4927 |
11 |
17 |
12 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0.370 |
0.4259 |
SEC |
15 |
11 |
Utah |
13 |
693 |
0.4698 |
13 |
703 |
0.4687 |
12 |
4 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0.290 |
0.4095 |
MWC |
16 |
19 |
Stanford |
17 |
541 |
0.3668 |
16 |
606 |
0.4040 |
15 |
16 |
11 |
23 |
0 |
3 |
0.450 |
0.4069 |
P10 |
17 |
16 |
Auburn |
14 |
655 |
0.4441 |
17 |
600 |
0.4000 |
10 |
18 |
14 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
0.330 |
0.3914 |
SEC |
18 |
9 |
Iowa |
18 |
463 |
0.3139 |
18 |
482 |
0.3213 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0.050 |
0.2284 |
BTen |
19 |
17 |
USC ** |
|
|
0.0000 |
20 |
414 |
0.2760 |
9 |
14 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
8 |
0.410 |
0.2287 |
P10 |
20 |
20 |
Miami (FL) |
19 |
418 |
0.2834 |
19 |
472 |
0.3147 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.1994 |
ACC |
21 |
18 |
Michigan |
22 |
255 |
0.1729 |
21 |
291 |
0.1940 |
0 |
11 |
8 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0.190 |
0.1856 |
BTen |
22 |
25 |
West Virginia |
21 |
315 |
0.2136 |
22 |
258 |
0.1720 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0.060 |
0.1485 |
East |
23 |
24 |
Penn State |
20 |
335 |
0.2271 |
23 |
198 |
0.1320 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0.040 |
0.1330 |
BTen |
24 |
23 |
Oklahoma State |
25 |
103 |
0.0698 |
32 |
22 |
0.0147 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
13 |
0.240 |
0.1082 |
B12 |
25 |
28 |
Missouri |
24 |
123 |
0.0834 |
31 |
30 |
0.0200 |
2 |
19 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0.210 |
0.1045 |
B12 |
26 |
31 |
Michigan State |
23 |
125 |
0.0847 |
25 |
45 |
0.0300 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0.110 |
0.0749 |
BTen |
27 |
22 |
Texas Tech |
41 |
2 |
0.0014 |
|
|
0.0000 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
0.120 |
0.0405 |
B12 |
28 |
34 |
Florida State |
27 |
56 |
0.0380 |
28 |
40 |
0.0267 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0.050 |
0.0382 |
ACC |
29 |
44 |
Nevada |
26 |
58 |
0.0393 |
27 |
41 |
0.0273 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.030 |
0.0322 |
WAC |
30 |
33 |
Oregon State |
28 |
53 |
0.0359 |
24 |
75 |
0.0500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0.000 |
0.0286 |
P10 |
31 |
46 |
Kansas State |
39 |
4 |
0.0027 |
37 |
4 |
0.0027 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0.080 |
0.0285 |
B12 |
32 |
26 |
Air Force |
32 |
15 |
0.0102 |
26 |
44 |
0.0293 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0.040 |
0.0265 |
MWC |
33 |
56 |
NC State |
35 |
7 |
0.0047 |
33 |
14 |
0.0093 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.040 |
0.0180 |
ACC |
34 |
32 |
Pittsburgh |
29 |
30 |
0.0203 |
28 |
40 |
0.0267 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0.000 |
0.0157 |
East |
35 |
49 |
Northwestern |
32 |
15 |
0.0102 |
38 |
3 |
0.0020 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
0.030 |
0.0141 |
BTen |
36 |
38 |
Fresno State |
35 |
7 |
0.0047 |
30 |
35 |
0.0233 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0094 |
WAC |
37 |
42 |
Georgia Tech |
30 |
24 |
0.0163 |
33 |
14 |
0.0093 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0085 |
ACC |
38 |
35 |
Clemson |
31 |
17 |
0.0115 |
33 |
14 |
0.0093 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0070 |
ACC |
39 |
48 |
Boston College |
34 |
12 |
0.0081 |
|
|
0.0000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0027 |
ACC |
40 |
27 |
Houston |
35 |
7 |
0.0047 |
41 |
1 |
0.0007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0018 |
CUSA |
41 |
57 |
Temple |
38 |
5 |
0.0034 |
41 |
1 |
0.0007 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0014 |
MAC |
42 |
30 |
Texas A&M |
39 |
4 |
0.0027 |
41 |
1 |
0.0007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0011 |
B12 |
43 |
50 |
Arizona State |
|
|
0.0000 |
38 |
3 |
0.0020 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0007 |
P10 |
43 |
29 |
California |
|
|
0.0000 |
38 |
3 |
0.0020 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0007 |
P10 |
45 |
40 |
Virginia Tech |
41 |
2 |
0.0014 |
|
|
0.0000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0005 |
ACC |
46 |
52 |
Notre Dame |
|
|
0.0000 |
41 |
1 |
0.0007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0002 |
Ind |
** USC is ineligible to be placed in the
official BCS Standings for 2010. The Guru will continue to rank the
Trojans in the simulated standings as well as their approximate ranking in
the official standings.
Keys: Pvs = Previous week; Coach = USA Today Coaches Poll; AP = Associated Press Poll; Md
= Median ranking of 35 computer ratings; CM = Colley Matrix; JS = Jeff Sagarin; KM = Kenneth
Massey; RB = Richard Billingsley; Cp Avg = Computer Average;
Yellow indicates top team
in BCS conference; Orange
indicates top team in non-BCS conference.
Explanation: This rankings method is
a simulation of the actual BCS standings with the following variations: 1)
The AP Poll is used in place of the Harris Interactive Poll, which is not
published until after the fourth weekend of September; 2) Four of the six BCS computer ratings are available –
Colley Matrix, Jeff Sagarin, Kenneth Massey and
Richard Billingsley; 3) Two computer ratings – Anderson & Hester and Peter Wolfe – will not be available until
October, so they’re replaced by the median ranking of 35
computer ratings.
2010 Season
2009 Season
2008 Season
-
2008 BCS standings
tracking
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Aug.
20, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 2,
2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 9, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 16, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 23, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 30, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Oct. 6, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Oct. 13, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Oct.
19, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Oct.
26, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
2, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
9, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
16, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
23, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
30, 2008)
-
Final 2008 BCS standings
2007 Season
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 4, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 9, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 16, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 23, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 30, 2007)
- Unofficial BCS standings (Oct. 8, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 14, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 21, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 28, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 4, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 11, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 18, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 25, 2007)
- Final
2007 BCS standings
2006 Season
2005 Season (Full season standings)
2004 Season (Full season standings)
2003 Season (Full season standings)
2002 Season (Full season standings)
2001 Season (Full season standings)
2000 Season (Full season standings)
1999 Season (Full season standings)
1998 Season (Full season standings)
|