|
2009 BCS STANDINGS
(SIMULATED) – WEEK 3
Rank |
Pvs |
Team |
Rk |
Coach |
% |
Rk |
AP |
% |
Md |
CM |
JS |
KM |
PW |
RB |
Cp Avg |
BCS |
Conf |
1 |
3 |
Alabama |
3 |
1355 |
0.9186 |
3 |
1390 |
0.9267 |
21 |
20 |
12 |
15 |
0 |
24 |
0.680 |
0.8418 |
SEC |
2 |
2 |
Texas |
2 |
1412 |
0.9573 |
2 |
1428 |
0.9520 |
23 |
16 |
1 |
|
0 |
25 |
0.400 |
0.7698 |
B12 |
3 |
4 |
Florida |
1 |
1475 |
1.0000 |
1 |
1488 |
0.9920 |
25 |
6 |
|
|
0 |
22 |
0.280 |
0.7573 |
SEC |
4 |
5 |
LSU |
7 |
1122 |
0.7607 |
7 |
1120 |
0.7467 |
14 |
25 |
24 |
21 |
0 |
15 |
0.740 |
0.7491 |
SEC |
5 |
6 |
California |
6 |
1149 |
0.7790 |
6 |
1169 |
0.7793 |
19 |
17 |
20 |
18 |
0 |
11 |
0.650 |
0.7361 |
P10 |
6 |
7 |
Boise State |
8 |
976 |
0.6617 |
8 |
1038 |
0.6920 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
12 |
0 |
23 |
0.690 |
0.6812 |
WAC |
7 |
8 |
Penn State |
4 |
1274 |
0.8637 |
5 |
1212 |
0.8080 |
14 |
12 |
|
6 |
0 |
12 |
0.300 |
0.6572 |
BTen |
8 |
23 |
Miami (FL) |
13 |
724 |
0.4908 |
9 |
920 |
0.6133 |
13 |
24 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
7 |
0.690 |
0.5981 |
ACC |
9 |
10 |
Mississippi |
5 |
1182 |
0.8014 |
4 |
1213 |
0.8087 |
12 |
|
|
|
0 |
9 |
0.090 |
0.5667 |
SEC |
10 |
20 |
Cincinnati |
15 |
580 |
0.3932 |
14 |
739 |
0.4927 |
17 |
21 |
18 |
17 |
0 |
17 |
0.690 |
0.5253 |
East |
11 |
1 |
USC |
10 |
905 |
0.6136 |
12 |
825 |
0.5500 |
17 |
|
15 |
|
0 |
10 |
0.250 |
0.4712 |
P10 |
12 |
12 |
Oklahoma |
9 |
917 |
0.6217 |
10 |
862 |
0.5747 |
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
20 |
0.180 |
0.4588 |
B12 |
13 |
16 |
Virginia Tech |
12 |
853 |
0.5783 |
11 |
852 |
0.5680 |
10 |
3 |
7 |
|
0 |
8 |
0.180 |
0.4421 |
ACC |
14 |
11 |
Ohio State |
11 |
900 |
0.6102 |
13 |
810 |
0.5400 |
9 |
|
|
|
0 |
13 |
0.090 |
0.4134 |
BTen |
15 |
14 |
TCU |
14 |
701 |
0.4753 |
15 |
674 |
0.4493 |
11 |
|
|
|
0 |
14 |
0.110 |
0.3449 |
MWC |
16 |
18 |
North Carolina |
18 |
445 |
0.3017 |
22 |
271 |
0.1807 |
4 |
18 |
22 |
23 |
0 |
|
0.440 |
0.3075 |
ACC |
17 |
17 |
Oklahoma State |
16 |
576 |
0.3905 |
16 |
478 |
0.3187 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
0.000 |
0.2364 |
B12 |
18 |
39 |
Florida State |
25 |
154 |
0.1044 |
18 |
363 |
0.2420 |
5 |
|
21 |
22 |
0 |
6 |
0.320 |
0.2221 |
ACC |
19 |
26 |
Kansas |
19 |
381 |
0.2583 |
20 |
347 |
0.2313 |
9 |
5 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
0.090 |
0.1932 |
B12 |
20 |
22 |
Georgia |
17 |
457 |
0.3098 |
21 |
318 |
0.2120 |
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
16 |
0.020 |
0.1806 |
SEC |
21 |
21 |
Houston |
23 |
160 |
0.1085 |
17 |
455 |
0.3033 |
|
8 |
8 |
|
0 |
5 |
0.130 |
0.1806 |
CUSA |
22 |
34 |
Iowa |
30 |
58 |
0.0393 |
31 |
39 |
0.0260 |
10 |
23 |
17 |
19 |
0 |
|
0.460 |
0.1751 |
BTen |
23 |
9 |
Brigham Young |
20 |
279 |
0.1892 |
19 |
349 |
0.2327 |
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
4 |
0.040 |
0.1539 |
MWC |
24 |
24 |
Missouri |
21 |
214 |
0.1451 |
26 |
115 |
0.0767 |
6 |
11 |
6 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
0.240 |
0.1539 |
B12 |
25 |
13 |
Georgia Tech |
26 |
148 |
0.1003 |
27 |
102 |
0.0680 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0 |
|
0.230 |
0.1328 |
ACC |
26 |
52 |
Washington |
31 |
42 |
0.0285 |
24 |
194 |
0.1293 |
|
4 |
14 |
16 |
0 |
|
0.180 |
0.1126 |
P10 |
27 |
30 |
Michigan |
22 |
205 |
0.1390 |
23 |
247 |
0.1647 |
|
13 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0.010 |
0.1045 |
BTen |
28 |
37 |
Auburn |
29 |
62 |
0.0420 |
28 |
100 |
0.0667 |
2 |
22 |
10 |
8 |
0 |
|
0.200 |
0.1029 |
SEC |
29 |
25 |
Pittsburgh |
27 |
68 |
0.0461 |
29 |
91 |
0.0607 |
8 |
9 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
0.130 |
0.0789 |
East |
30 |
35 |
Wisconsin |
41 |
2 |
0.0014 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
15 |
11 |
10 |
0 |
|
0.210 |
0.0705 |
BTen |
31 |
19 |
Nebraska |
24 |
158 |
0.1071 |
25 |
132 |
0.0880 |
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0650 |
B12 |
32 |
52 |
Connecticut |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
16 |
20 |
0 |
|
0.160 |
0.0533 |
East |
33 |
31 |
Oregon |
34 |
34 |
0.0231 |
32 |
30 |
0.0200 |
2 |
|
9 |
|
0 |
21 |
0.110 |
0.0510 |
P10 |
34 |
43 |
Clemson |
|
|
0.0000 |
36 |
11 |
0.0073 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0 |
|
0.130 |
0.0458 |
ACC |
35 |
NR |
Indiana |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
0 |
|
0.100 |
0.0333 |
BTen |
36 |
28 |
Texas Tech |
35 |
22 |
0.0149 |
33 |
19 |
0.0127 |
7 |
|
|
|
0 |
19 |
0.070 |
0.0325 |
B12 |
37 |
33 |
Southern Miss |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
7 |
|
13 |
0 |
|
0.070 |
0.0233 |
CUSA |
38 |
32 |
UCLA |
32 |
38 |
0.0258 |
30 |
62 |
0.0413 |
|
14 |
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0224 |
P10 |
39 |
15 |
Utah |
28 |
63 |
0.0427 |
35 |
12 |
0.0080 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
18 |
0.000 |
0.0169 |
MWC |
40 |
36 |
Notre Dame |
32 |
38 |
0.0258 |
34 |
16 |
0.0107 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0121 |
Ind |
41 |
29 |
Oregon State |
39 |
6 |
0.0041 |
37 |
4 |
0.0027 |
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0.010 |
0.0056 |
P10 |
42 |
44 |
Kentucky |
36 |
16 |
0.0108 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0036 |
SEC |
43 |
42 |
South Florida |
37 |
12 |
0.0081 |
39 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0029 |
East |
44 |
45 |
Colorado State |
40 |
4 |
0.0027 |
37 |
4 |
0.0027 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0018 |
MWC |
45 |
50 |
South Carolina |
38 |
7 |
0.0047 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0016 |
SEC |
46 |
47 |
Minnesota |
42 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0002 |
BTen |
47 |
52 |
UL-Lafayette |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0000 |
Sun |
47 |
NR |
Arizona State |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0000 |
P10 |
47 |
41 |
Baylor |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
7 |
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0000 |
B12 |
47 |
27 |
Arizona |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0000 |
P10 |
47 |
52 |
Ohio |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0.000 |
0.0000 |
MAC |
Keys: Pvs = Previous Week; Coach = USA Today Coaches Poll; AP = Associated Press Poll; Md
= Median ranking of 30 computer ratings; CM = Colley Matrix; JS = Jeff Sagarin; KM = Kenneth
Massey; RB = Richard Billingsley; Cp Avg = Computer Average;
Yellow indicates top team
in BCS conference; Orange
indicates top team in non-BCS conference.
Explanation: This rankings method is
a simulation of the actual BCS standings with the following variations: 1)
The AP Poll is used in place of the Harris Interactive Poll, which is not
published until after the fourth weekend of September; 2) Four of the six BCS computer ratings are available –
Colley Matrix, Jeff Sagarin, Kenneth Massey and
Richard Billingsley; 3) The other two computer ratings – Anderson &
Hester and Peter Wolfe – will not be available until
late September and mid-October, respectively, so they’re replaced by the median ranking of 30
computer ratings.
2009 Season
2008 Season
-
2008 BCS standings
tracking
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Aug.
20, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 2,
2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 9, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 16, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 23, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 30, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Oct. 6, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Oct. 13, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Oct.
19, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Oct.
26, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
2, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
9, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
16, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
23, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
30, 2008)
-
Final 2008 BCS standings
2007 Season
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 4, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 9, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 16, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 23, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 30, 2007)
- Unofficial BCS standings (Oct. 8, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 14, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 21, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 28, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 4, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 11, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 18, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 25, 2007)
- Final
2007 BCS standings
2006 Season
2005 Season (Full season standings)
2004 Season (Full season standings)
2003 Season (Full season standings)
2002 Season (Full season standings)
2001 Season (Full season standings)
2000 Season (Full season standings)
1999 Season (Full season standings)
1998 Season (Full season standings)
|