|
2009 BCS STANDINGS
(SIMULATED) – WEEK 1
Rank |
Pvs |
Team |
Rk |
Coach |
% |
Rk |
AP |
% |
Md |
CM |
JS |
KM* |
PW |
RB |
Cp Avg |
BCS |
Conf |
1 |
1 |
Florida |
1 |
1472 |
0.9980 |
1 |
1493 |
0.9953 |
25 |
|
9 |
25 |
|
21 |
0.800 |
0.9311 |
SEC |
2 |
4 |
USC |
3 |
1352 |
0.9166 |
3 |
1355 |
0.9033 |
24 |
|
25 |
24 |
|
23 |
0.960 |
0.9266 |
P10 |
3 |
2 |
Texas |
2 |
1407 |
0.9539 |
2 |
1424 |
0.9493 |
23 |
|
16 |
23 |
|
18 |
0.800 |
0.9011 |
B12 |
4 |
6 |
Alabama |
4 |
1299 |
0.8807 |
4 |
1331 |
0.8873 |
20 |
|
24 |
21 |
|
25 |
0.900 |
0.8893 |
SEC |
5 |
12 |
Oklahoma State |
6 |
1114 |
0.7553 |
5 |
1201 |
0.8007 |
14 |
|
18 |
20 |
|
20 |
0.720 |
0.7586 |
B12 |
6 |
5 |
Ohio State |
7 |
1106 |
0.7498 |
8 |
985 |
0.6567 |
17 |
|
22 |
17 |
|
17 |
0.730 |
0.7122 |
BTen |
7 |
7 |
Penn State |
5 |
1145 |
0.7763 |
7 |
1082 |
0.7213 |
17 |
|
11 |
18 |
|
13 |
0.590 |
0.6959 |
BTen |
8 |
22 |
Brigham Young |
12 |
755 |
0.5119 |
9 |
984 |
0.6560 |
12 |
|
23 |
16 |
|
22 |
0.730 |
0.6326 |
MWC |
9 |
15 |
Boise State |
11 |
803 |
0.5444 |
12 |
882 |
0.5880 |
19 |
|
20 |
11 |
|
24 |
0.740 |
0.6241 |
WAC |
10 |
14 |
California |
10 |
935 |
0.6339 |
10 |
971 |
0.6473 |
16 |
|
17 |
13 |
|
7 |
0.530 |
0.6037 |
P10 |
11 |
9 |
LSU |
9 |
977 |
0.6624 |
11 |
890 |
0.5933 |
9 |
|
21 |
15 |
|
9 |
0.540 |
0.5986 |
SEC |
12 |
11 |
Mississippi |
8 |
1006 |
0.6820 |
6 |
1095 |
0.7300 |
15 |
|
0 |
10 |
|
12 |
0.370 |
0.5940 |
SEC |
13 |
3 |
Oklahoma |
14 |
682 |
0.4624 |
13 |
782 |
0.5213 |
21 |
|
19 |
19 |
|
15 |
0.740 |
0.5746 |
B12 |
14 |
16 |
TCU |
16 |
543 |
0.3681 |
16 |
523 |
0.3487 |
14 |
|
13 |
4 |
|
14 |
0.450 |
0.3889 |
MWC |
15 |
17 |
Utah |
17 |
503 |
0.3410 |
17 |
404 |
0.2693 |
12 |
|
5 |
8 |
|
19 |
0.440 |
0.3501 |
MWC |
16 |
8 |
Virginia Tech |
15 |
633 |
0.4292 |
14 |
652 |
0.4347 |
2 |
|
10 |
0 |
|
4 |
0.160 |
0.3413 |
ACC |
17 |
18 |
Georgia Tech |
13 |
685 |
0.4644 |
15 |
630 |
0.4200 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
0.050 |
0.3115 |
ACC |
18 |
10 |
Georgia |
21 |
304 |
0.2061 |
21 |
294 |
0.1960 |
3 |
|
12 |
5 |
|
11 |
0.310 |
0.2374 |
SEC |
19 |
25 |
Missouri |
27 |
97 |
0.0658 |
25 |
126 |
0.0840 |
9 |
|
15 |
22 |
|
6 |
0.520 |
0.2233 |
B12 |
20 |
31 |
Cincinnati |
23 |
187 |
0.1268 |
23 |
248 |
0.1653 |
8 |
|
7 |
12 |
|
8 |
0.350 |
0.2140 |
East |
21 |
38 |
Miami (FL) |
22 |
276 |
0.1871 |
20 |
315 |
0.2100 |
0 |
|
14 |
6 |
|
0 |
0.200 |
0.1990 |
ACC |
22 |
28 |
Nebraska |
18 |
360 |
0.2441 |
22 |
266 |
0.1773 |
7 |
|
0 |
7 |
|
2 |
0.160 |
0.1938 |
B12 |
23 |
29 |
Notre Dame |
20 |
335 |
0.2271 |
18 |
383 |
0.2553 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.000 |
0.1608 |
Ind |
24 |
19 |
Texas Tech |
30 |
53 |
0.0359 |
29 |
53 |
0.0353 |
10 |
|
0 |
14 |
|
16 |
0.400 |
0.1571 |
B12 |
25 |
24 |
North Carolina |
19 |
358 |
0.2427 |
19 |
338 |
0.2253 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.000 |
0.1560 |
ACC |
26 |
21 |
Oregon State |
24 |
169 |
0.1146 |
26 |
113 |
0.0753 |
3 |
|
0 |
9 |
|
3 |
0.150 |
0.1133 |
P10 |
27 |
13 |
Oregon |
31 |
50 |
0.0339 |
30 |
47 |
0.0313 |
6 |
|
8 |
0 |
|
10 |
0.240 |
0.1017 |
P10 |
28 |
27 |
Kansas |
25 |
139 |
0.0942 |
24 |
196 |
0.1307 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
0.030 |
0.0850 |
B12 |
29 |
30 |
Michigan State |
26 |
133 |
0.0902 |
27 |
83 |
0.0553 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0.010 |
0.0518 |
BTen |
30 |
32 |
Clemson |
33 |
24 |
0.0163 |
31 |
40 |
0.0267 |
0 |
|
4 |
3 |
|
0 |
0.070 |
0.0376 |
ACC |
31 |
23 |
Iowa |
28 |
70 |
0.0475 |
35 |
24 |
0.0160 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.030 |
0.0312 |
BTen |
32 |
42 |
South Carolina |
34 |
23 |
0.0156 |
45 |
3 |
0.0020 |
0 |
|
6 |
1 |
|
0 |
0.070 |
0.0292 |
SEC |
33 |
33 |
Pittsburgh |
32 |
26 |
0.0176 |
28 |
82 |
0.0547 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.010 |
0.0274 |
East |
34 |
20 |
Florida State |
29 |
62 |
0.0420 |
32 |
39 |
0.0260 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.000 |
0.0227 |
ACC |
35 |
26 |
West Virginia |
36 |
13 |
0.0088 |
33 |
32 |
0.0213 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.020 |
0.0167 |
East |
36 |
44 |
Tennessee |
35 |
21 |
0.0142 |
34 |
30 |
0.0200 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.000 |
0.0114 |
SEC |
37 |
39 |
Auburn |
36 |
13 |
0.0088 |
42 |
4 |
0.0027 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0.010 |
0.0072 |
SEC |
38 |
60 |
Michigan |
41 |
4 |
0.0027 |
36 |
18 |
0.0120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0049 |
BTen |
39 |
41 |
UCLA |
44 |
2 |
0.0014 |
36 |
18 |
0.0120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0045 |
P10 |
40 |
NR |
Baylor |
44 |
2 |
0.0014 |
38 |
17 |
0.0113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0042 |
B12 |
41 |
37 |
Arizona |
40 |
5 |
0.0034 |
40 |
12 |
0.0080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0038 |
P10 |
42 |
36 |
Boston College |
43 |
3 |
0.0020 |
39 |
14 |
0.0093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0038 |
ACC |
43 |
45 |
South Florida |
38 |
12 |
0.0081 |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0029 |
East |
44 |
19 |
Kentucky |
39 |
8 |
0.0054 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0018 |
SEC |
45 |
40 |
East Carolina |
|
|
0.0000 |
41 |
6 |
0.0040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0013 |
CUSA |
46 |
50 |
Arkansas |
44 |
2 |
0.0014 |
45 |
3 |
0.0020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0011 |
SEC |
47 |
NR |
Colorado State |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
42 |
4 |
0.0027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0011 |
MWC |
48 |
47 |
Northwestern |
41 |
4 |
0.0027 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0009 |
BTen |
49 |
NR |
Air Force |
|
|
0.0000 |
42 |
4 |
0.0027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0009 |
MWC |
50 |
62 |
Tulsa |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0004 |
CUSA |
51 |
60 |
Minnesota |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0002 |
BTen |
52 |
58 |
Houston |
|
|
0.0000 |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0002 |
CUSA |
52 |
51 |
Southern Miss |
|
|
0.0000 |
47 |
1 |
0.0007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000 |
0.0002 |
CUSA |
Keys: Pvs = Previous Week; Coach = USA Today Coaches Poll; AP = Associated Press Poll; Md
= Median ranking of 38 computer ratings; JS = Jeff Sagarin; KM* = Kenneth
Massey MOV; RB = Richard Billingsley; Cp Avg = Computer Average;
Yellow indicates top team
in BCS conference; Orange
indicates top team in non-BCS conference.
Explanation: This rankings method is
a simulation of the actual BCS standings with the following variations: 1)
The AP Poll is used in place of the Harris Interactive Poll, which is not
published until after the fourth weekend of September; 2) Three of the six
BCS computer ratings are available – Jeff Sagarin, Kenneth Massey (MOV but
not the BCS version) and
Richard Billingsley; 3) The other three computer ratings – Anderson &
Hester, Colley Matrix and Peter Wolfe – will not be available until
mid-September or October, so they’re replaced by the median ranking of 38
computer ratings.
2009 Season
2008 Season
-
2008 BCS standings
tracking
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Aug.
20, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 2,
2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 9, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 16, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 23, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Sept. 30, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Oct. 6, 2008)
-
Unofficial BCS standings
(Oct. 13, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Oct.
19, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Oct.
26, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
2, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
9, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
16, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
23, 2008)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov.
30, 2008)
-
Final 2008 BCS standings
2007 Season
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 4, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 9, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 16, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 23, 2007)
-
Unofficial BCS standings (Sept. 30, 2007)
- Unofficial BCS standings (Oct. 8, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 14, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 21, 2007)
- Official
BCS standings (Oct. 28, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 4, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 11, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 18, 2007)
-
Official BCS standings (Nov. 25, 2007)
- Final
2007 BCS standings
2006 Season
2005 Season (Full season standings)
2004 Season (Full season standings)
2003 Season (Full season standings)
2002 Season (Full season standings)
2001 Season (Full season standings)
2000 Season (Full season standings)
1999 Season (Full season standings)
1998 Season (Full season standings)
|